Good morning,
Low-income students can't afford SAT prep. Mental health check-ins happen once per year (if at all). Non-technical teams can't monitor API uptime without bugging engineers.
Today: Three ideas that close gaps nobody's addressing.
💡 IDEA #1: SAT Prep Specifically for Low-Income Students
TLDR: Free or subsidized SAT prep funded by grants and university partnerships. Bridge the access gap, get students into college.
The Problem
Wealthy students pay $1,000-5,000 for SAT tutors and prep courses (Kaplan, Princeton Review).
Low-income students can't afford it. They rely on:
Free Khan Academy (good but no accountability)
School guidance counselors (overworked, 500:1 ratios)
Generic study guides (no personalization)
Result: 200-point SAT gap between high-income and low-income students. That gap determines college admission and scholarship eligibility.
This isn't a quality problem. It's an access problem.
The Numbers
3.7 million high school students take SAT annually
40% are low-income (eligible for fee waivers)
SAT score impact: 100-point increase = $10k-50k more in scholarships
Current free options: limited effectiveness (no live support)
How It Works
Free SAT prep program that includes:
Live online tutoring (small groups, 10-15 students)
Personalized study plans (AI identifies weak areas)
Practice tests with detailed feedback
Accountability check-ins (weekly progress tracking)
College application guidance (bonus value)
Funding model:
Grants from education nonprofits
University partnerships (they want diverse students)
Corporate sponsorships (companies funding education initiatives)
Sliding scale for students who can afford $10-50/month
Not pure charity: Students who can pay $20/month do. Students who can't = fully subsidized.
Business Model
Revenue sources:
Grants: $500k-2M/year (Bezos Foundation, Gates Foundation, local education grants)
University partnerships: $100k-500k/year (they pay to recruit diverse talent)
Corporate sponsorships: $200k-1M/year (CSR budgets)
Paid students (sliding scale): $50k-200k/year
At scale (5,000 students):
Cost per student: $200-300/year (tutors, platform, materials)
Total cost: $1M-1.5M/year
Revenue: $1M-3M/year from grants + partnerships + sliding scale
Sustainable nonprofit or low-margin for-profit.
Why This Wins
You're not competing with Kaplan on price. You're solving an access problem they ignore. Universities want diverse students. Foundations want to fund proven impact. You connect all three.
Go-to-Market
Partner with high schools in low-income areas. Offer free program to 100 students as pilot. Track SAT score improvements (target: 100+ point average increase). Use results to secure grants and university partnerships. Scale via community organizations and guidance counselors.
💡 IDEA #2: Mental Health Check-Ins via Text
TLDR: Therapist-approved prompts sent via text daily. Track mental health trends, flag issues early, charge $10/month.
The Problem
Most people check mental health once per year (if at all). By the time they seek help, they're in crisis.
Early warning signs get missed:
Sleep patterns changing
Mood swings
Stress escalating
Anxiety building
What if you checked in daily, like Fitbit for mental health?
Current options:
Therapy: expensive ($100-200/session), reactive not proactive
Apps like Headspace: meditation, not tracking
Journaling: no structure, no accountability
Nobody's building "daily mental health check-ins that actually work."
The Numbers
50 million Americans experience mental health issues annually
60% don't seek treatment (stigma, cost, access)
Early intervention reduces crisis risk by 70%
Willingness to pay: $10-20/month for preventive tool
How It Works
Daily text prompts:
"How's your sleep been? (1-10)"
"Stress level today? (1-10)"
"Did anything make you anxious?"
"One thing you're grateful for?"
Takes 60 seconds to respond.
Platform tracks:
Trends over time (sleep declining, stress rising)
Red flags (multiple low days in a row)
Correlations (stress spikes on Mondays, sleep drops on weekends)
When trends worsen:
Alerts user: "Your sleep scores dropped 40% this week. Consider checking in with therapist."
Suggests interventions (breathing exercises, call friend, schedule therapy)
Connects to licensed therapists (referral partnerships)
Privacy-first: No selling data. Encrypted. Opt-in only.
Business Model
Free: 7-day trial
Basic: $10/mo (daily check-ins, trend tracking)
Pro: $20/mo (crisis alerts, therapist connection, family sharing)
At 10,000 users averaging $12/mo = $120k MRR
Why This Wins
Therapy is reactive (wait until crisis). This is proactive (catch issues early). $10/month is impulse-buy pricing for mental health. Therapists will refer patients (helps them spot patterns between sessions).
Go-to-Market
Launch on Product Hunt. Partner with therapists (refer clients for between-session tracking). Post in r/mentalhealth and mental health TikTok. Content: "7 early warning signs your mental health is declining." Offer free month to anyone in therapy.
💡 IDEA #3: API Monitoring for Non-Technical Teams
TLDR: Status page and uptime monitoring that non-technical teams can understand. No engineering required. $29-99/month.
The Problem
When Stripe goes down, your payment processing stops. When Twilio breaks, your SMS notifications fail. When OpenAI has issues, your AI features die.
Who finds out first? Customers. Not you.
Current options:
StatusPage.io: great but requires technical setup
Pingdom/Datadog: built for engineers, non-technical teams lost
Manual checking: nobody does it consistently
The gap: Non-technical teams (ops, customer success, marketing) need to know when APIs break, but can't read technical dashboards.
The Numbers
50 million companies use APIs (Stripe, Twilio, SendGrid, etc.)
Average company uses 10-20 APIs
API downtime costs: $5,000-100,000 per hour
Most companies don't monitor proactively (only react to customer complaints)
How It Works
Simple monitoring dashboard:
Add APIs you depend on (Stripe, Twilio, OpenAI, etc.)
Platform pings them every 60 seconds
When one goes down → instant Slack/email alert
Non-technical alert: "Stripe payments are down. Customers can't check out."
Status page shows uptime history (green/red, no technical jargon)
No code required. Just paste API endpoint or select from preset list (Stripe, etc.).
Bonus features:
Historical uptime tracking (99.9% vs 99.5% = huge difference)
Incident alerts sent to customers automatically
Compare API reliability (should we switch from Twilio to MessageBird?)
Business Model
Starter: $29/mo (monitor 5 APIs, basic alerts)
Pro: $79/mo (monitor 20 APIs, Slack integration, status page)
Business: $149/mo (unlimited APIs, custom alerts, SLA tracking)
At 1,000 customers averaging $60/mo = $60k MRR
Why This Wins
Technical monitoring tools exist but require engineers to set up and interpret. You make it accessible to non-technical teams. When Stripe goes down, ops team knows immediately—no waiting for engineering to check logs.
Competitive Landscape
Pingdom/Datadog: Built for engineers, $100+/month, complex
StatusPage.io: Great for creating status pages, not monitoring
You: Dead simple monitoring anyone can set up in 5 minutes
Go-to-Market
Launch on Product Hunt. Target ops and customer success teams (they feel API pain but can't access technical tools). SEO: "API monitoring for non-technical teams" "Stripe uptime monitoring." Partner with no-code tools (Zapier users need this).
Your weekly haul of tools, links, and discoveries worth stealing.
Five more worth bookmarking, not just skimming.
A brutally practical guide to staying “default alive” as a tiny founder
https://www.defmacro.org/2014/10/03/default-alive-or-default-dead.html
(Defmacro)What selling a very small SaaS actually looks like (numbers included)
https://tinyacquisitions.com/blog
(Tiny Acquisitions)Why most early traction is fake — and what real traction looks like
https://longform.asmartbear.com/traction-is-not-customers/
(Jason Cohen)A founder diary that quietly explains why slow growth compounds
https://www.curiousfounder.com
(Curious Founder)The economics of niche software nobody brags about on social
https://www.softwareideas.io/blog
(Software Ideas)
🚀 Founder Story: How Duolingo Got Rejected 3x Before Becoming a $6B Company
The Beginning: Luis von Ahn pitched Duolingo to YC three times. Rejected every time.
Investors said: "Free language learning? How will you make money?"
He built it anyway.
The Insight: Access to education shouldn't require money. Make it free, figure out monetization later.
The Growth:
2011: Launched with free model
2014: 25 million users
2017: Added paid tier ($7/mo for no ads)
2021: IPO at $6B valuation
2025: 500M+ users, $500M+ annual revenue
What You Can Steal: Duolingo proved free-first can work in education. The SAT prep idea follows the same playbook: make it free (or close to it), fund through grants/partnerships/sliding scale, scale impact before revenue.
Rejection from VCs doesn't mean the idea is bad. It means the business model doesn't fit their framework.
💭 Final Thought
The best opportunities solve access problems, not innovation problems.
Low-income students need SAT prep (it exists, they just can't afford it).
People need mental health tracking (therapy exists, but it's reactive).
Teams need API monitoring (tools exist, but they're too technical).
You're not inventing new categories. You're making existing solutions accessible.
Access > innovation.
That's it for today.
Building one of these? Reply - I read everything.
Sponsor Loose Ends? Fill out this form.
Tomorrow: Mobile Apps, Subscription Boxes, and Infrastructure Tools.
Connor
P.S. Next week: Saturday deep dives start. First topic: "Audience Is Not Demand."