Good morning,

Micro-creators can't get brand deals alone. Small landlords can't afford AppFolio. Developers don't want to manage webhook servers.

Today: Three ideas that solve backend problems nobody talks about.

💡 IDEA #1: Sponsorship Matchmaking for Micro-Creators

TLDR: Aggregate 100 micro-creators (1k-10k followers), sell them as a package to brands. Brands get better ROI, creators monetize small followings, you take 30% commission.

The Problem

The creator economy has a massive gap in the middle:

Macro-influencers (100k+ followers):

  • Get brand deals easily ($5k-50k per post)

  • Work with agencies and managers

  • Negotiate directly with brands

Micro-creators (1k-10k followers):

  • Too small to interest brands individually

  • No access to agencies (minimums are 50k+ followers)

  • Highly engaged audiences (5-10% engagement vs 1-2% for macro)

  • Can't monetize despite having real influence

Brands' problem:

  • Macro-influencers are expensive ($50k for one post)

  • Authenticity declining (followers know it's paid)

  • ROI questionable (1-2% engagement, mostly bots)

The arbitrage: Aggregate micro-creators, sell as package to brands for better ROI than macro-influencers.

The Numbers

  • 50 million creators worldwide

  • 30 million have 1k-10k followers (micro-creators)

  • Average engagement: 5-8% (vs 1-2% for macro)

  • Brands spend $15B annually on influencer marketing

  • Only 10% goes to micro-creators (access gap)

How It Works

For Micro-Creators:

  1. Apply to join platform (minimum 1k followers, 3% engagement rate)

  2. Create profile with niche, audience demographics, past content

  3. Get matched with relevant brand campaigns

  4. Create authentic content featuring brand

  5. Post to their audience

  6. Get paid $50-200 per post (depending on following and niche)

For Brands:

  1. Submit campaign brief (target audience, budget, message)

  2. You match them with 100 relevant micro-creators

  3. Creators create authentic content

  4. Brand gets 100 posts across diverse audiences

  5. Pay $10,000-20,000 (vs $50k for one macro-influencer)

Your role:

  • Vet creators (real followers, good engagement, quality content)

  • Match brands with right creators

  • Manage campaign logistics

  • Handle payments and reporting

  • Track results (impressions, engagement, conversions)

Example campaign:

  • Skincare brand wants to reach women 25-40

  • Budget: $15,000

  • You match with 100 micro-creators (beauty, wellness, lifestyle niches)

  • Each creator posts once: $150 per post

  • Creators get: $15,000 total (you take 30% = $4,500)

  • Brand pays you: $19,500

  • Your profit: $4,500

Business Model

Revenue model: 30% commission on all campaigns

At scale:

  • 20 campaigns per month

  • $15,000 average campaign size

  • $300,000 monthly campaign volume

  • Your cut (30%): $90,000/month = $1.08M annual revenue

Additional revenue:

  • Creator premium: $29/mo for priority access to campaigns

  • Brand analytics: $499/mo for performance tracking

  • Managed service: 40% commission for full-service campaigns

Why This Wins

For brands:

  • Better ROI: 100 authentic posts vs 1 paid post

  • Higher engagement: 5-8% vs 1-2%

  • Lower cost: $15k vs $50k

  • More authentic: small creators feel real, not celebrity endorsements

  • Diverse audiences: reach different demographics simultaneously

For creators:

  • Finally monetize small following

  • $50-200 per post adds up (4 campaigns/month = $600-800)

  • Build portfolio for bigger opportunities

  • No minimum follower requirements (1k is enough)

For you:

  • High margins (30% commission, low overhead)

  • Scalable (platform handles matching and logistics)

  • Network effects (more creators = more attractive to brands)

Competitive Landscape

  • AspireIQ, GRIN: Focus on macro-influencers (50k+ minimums)

  • Fohr, Creator.co: Self-service, hard for micro-creators to get noticed

  • Influencer agencies: Only work with established creators

  • You: Built specifically for aggregating micro-creators

Go-to-Market

Phase 1: Build Supply (Months 1-3)

  • Recruit 500 micro-creators manually

  • Target: beauty, fitness, food, lifestyle, tech niches

  • Instagram and TikTok focus initially

  • Vet for real followers and good engagement

  • Goal: 500 creators ready for campaigns

Phase 2: Prove Demand (Months 4-6)

  • Land 5 test brands (DTC companies, small budgets)

  • Run campaigns at discounted rates ($5k vs $15k)

  • Track results obsessively (engagement, conversions, ROI)

  • Get case studies and testimonials

  • Goal: Prove 3-5x better ROI than macro-influencers

Phase 3: Scale (Months 7-18)

  • Hire brand partnerships manager

  • Target mid-market DTC brands ($100k-1M marketing budgets)

  • Automate matching and campaign management

  • Expand to 5,000 creators across more niches

  • Goal: 20+ campaigns per month, $1M+ annual revenue

Risks & Mitigations

Risk: Brands go direct to creators after match
Mitigation: Don't reveal creator identities until after payment. Creators sign agreement not to accept direct deals from your brands for 6 months.

Risk: Creator quality inconsistent
Mitigation: Strict vetting process, remove creators with low performance

Risk: Hard to scale campaign management
Mitigation: Build platform tools for self-service campaign posting and tracking

💡 IDEA #2: Webhook Relay Service

TLDR: Developers need reliable webhook infrastructure but don't want to manage servers. Charge $29-79/month for simple webhook handling.

The Problem

Webhooks are how modern apps communicate:

  • Stripe sends webhook when payment succeeds

  • Twilio sends webhook when SMS is delivered

  • GitHub sends webhook when code is pushed

Developer problems:

  • Need server running 24/7 to receive webhooks

  • Server goes down → miss critical webhooks

  • Hard to debug when webhooks fail

  • Rate limiting and retry logic is complex

  • Infrastructure management for simple task

Current solutions:

  • Host your own server (AWS, Heroku) = $20-100/mo + management time

  • Use Zapier = $20-70/mo but clunky for developers

  • Build it yourself = weeks of work

The gap: Simple, reliable webhook infrastructure-as-a-service for developers.

The Numbers

  • 27 million developers worldwide

  • 10 million build apps with webhook integrations

  • Current spend: $20-100/month on servers + time

  • Willingness to pay: $29-79/month for managed service

How It Works

The service:

1. Receive Webhooks

2. Queue and Retry

  • Store webhook in queue

  • Attempt delivery to developer's endpoint

  • If fails: retry with exponential backoff (1min, 5min, 15min, 1hr, etc.)

  • Keep trying for 72 hours

  • Log all attempts

3. Developer Endpoints

4. Dashboard

  • See all webhooks received

  • Filter by source (Stripe, Twilio, GitHub, etc.)

  • Replay failed webhooks manually

  • View request/response logs

  • Set up alerts for failures

Key features:

  • Guaranteed delivery (queue + retry)

  • Request inspection (see exact payload)

  • Webhook testing (send test webhooks)

  • Local development (tunnel webhooks to localhost)

  • Rate limiting protection

  • IP whitelisting for security

Business Model

Pricing:

  • Starter: $29/mo (10,000 webhooks/month, 7-day retention)

  • Pro: $79/mo (100,000 webhooks/month, 30-day retention)

  • Business: $199/mo (1M webhooks/month, 90-day retention, priority support)

At 1,000 developers averaging $60/mo: $60k MRR = $720k annual revenue

Additional revenue:

  • Overage fees: $10 per 10,000 webhooks over limit

  • White-label: $299/mo (remove branding)

  • Enterprise: Custom pricing for high volume

Why This Wins

Managing webhook infrastructure is painful:

  • Server needs to be always-on

  • Need database to store webhook history

  • Retry logic is complex

  • Debugging is hard (webhooks are fire-and-forget)

You handle all the complexity:

  • Infrastructure already built

  • Reliable delivery guaranteed

  • Easy debugging with logs

  • Pay-as-you-go pricing

Developers happily pay to avoid infrastructure:

  • Infrastructure is unglamorous

  • They'd rather focus on product

  • $79/mo cheaper than engineer time building/maintaining it

Competitive Landscape

  • Ngrok: Tunneling, not webhook management

  • Zapier: Not built for developers, too GUI-heavy

  • AWS Lambda + SQS: Requires setup, not turnkey

  • You: Purpose-built webhook infrastructure for developers

Go-to-Market

Phase 1: Launch (Months 1-3)

  • Product Hunt launch

  • Post on Hacker News: "I built the webhook service I wish existed"

  • Dev.to and Reddit r/webdev posts

  • Free tier: 1,000 webhooks/month forever

  • Goal: 500 free users, 50 paying

Phase 2: Grow (Months 4-9)

  • SEO: "webhook infrastructure" "webhook relay"

  • Integration partnerships (list in Stripe app marketplace, etc.)

  • Documentation and tutorials

  • Open source webhook debugging tool (marketing)

  • Goal: 2,000 users, 300 paying

Phase 3: Scale (Months 10-18)

  • Team plans (shared webhook endpoints)

  • Advanced features (webhook transformations, routing)

  • Enterprise sales

  • Goal: 5,000 users, 1,000 paying

Technical Feasibility

Tech stack:

  • API gateway to receive webhooks

  • Message queue (RabbitMQ, SQS)

  • Worker processes for delivery

  • Database for logs (PostgreSQL)

  • Simple dashboard (React)

Build time: 6-8 weeks for MVP

Operational costs:

  • Hosting: $500-1,000/month at 1,000 users

  • Gross margin: 85-90%

Risks & Mitigations

Risk: Large players build this feature
Mitigation: Move fast, build community, focus on developer experience

Risk: Infrastructure costs scale with usage
Mitigation: Pricing covers costs with healthy margin, overage fees for high usage

Risk: Downtime = missed webhooks
Mitigation: Multi-region deployment, 99.9% uptime SLA

💡 IDEA #3: Property Management Software for Small Landlords

TLDR: AppFolio is built for 100+ units. Small landlords (1-10 properties) need simple tenant tracking, maintenance, rent collection. Charge $29-49/month.

The Problem

10 million Americans are small landlords (1-10 properties). They're stuck between two bad options:

Spreadsheets:

  • Track tenants, leases, rent payments manually

  • Forget maintenance requests

  • No organized system for repairs

  • Miss rent payments

  • No paper trail for legal issues

Enterprise software (AppFolio, Buildium):

  • Built for 100+ unit properties

  • $300-500/month minimum

  • Complex features small landlords don't need

  • Requires training to use

  • Overkill for 1-10 properties

The gap: Simple, affordable property management for small landlords.

The Numbers

  • 10 million small landlords in US (1-10 properties)

  • Average properties owned: 3-4

  • Current spend: $0 (spreadsheets) or $300+/month (enterprise)

  • Willingness to pay: $29-79/month for right solution

  • Time wasted on management: 5-10 hours/month

How It Works

Core features (nothing complex):

1. Tenant Management

  • Track tenant info, lease dates, security deposits

  • Store copies of lease agreements

  • Set lease end date reminders

  • Contact history with each tenant

2. Rent Collection

  • Automated rent reminders (email/text 3 days before due)

  • Accept online payments (ACH or card)

  • Track payment history

  • Late fee automation

  • Generate receipts

3. Maintenance Tracking

  • Tenants submit maintenance requests through portal

  • Landlord assigns to contractor or self

  • Track status (requested → in progress → completed)

  • Store photos and receipts

  • Maintenance history per property

4. Financial Overview

  • Income per property

  • Expenses per property

  • Profit/loss statements

  • Tax-ready reports (1099s, Schedule E)

  • Export to QuickBooks

5. Document Storage

  • Lease agreements

  • Inspection reports

  • Receipts and invoices

  • Photos

  • Insurance documents

What it DOESN'T have (enterprise bloat):

  • Complex accounting features

  • Advanced reporting and analytics

  • Multi-currency support

  • API access

  • White-label options

Just the basics, done extremely well.

Business Model

Pricing:

  • Starter: $29/mo (up to 5 properties)

  • Pro: $49/mo (up to 15 properties, priority support)

  • Add-on: $5/mo per additional property beyond limit

Transaction fees (optional):

  • 1% fee on rent payments (tenant or landlord pays)

  • OR flat $39/mo for unlimited rent processing

At 10,000 landlords averaging $40/mo: $400k MRR = $4.8M annual revenue

Unit Economics:

  • CAC: $100 (content marketing, SEO, Facebook ads to landlords)

  • LTV: $960 (average 24-month retention)

  • Churn: 4%/month

  • Gross margin: 90%

Why This Wins

AppFolio is overkill:

  • Built for property management companies with 100+ units

  • Small landlords pay for features they never use

  • Too expensive to justify for 2-3 properties

  • Learning curve is steep

Spreadsheets are painful:

  • Forget to send rent reminders

  • Lose track of maintenance requests

  • No organized history

  • Nightmare during tax time

You're the Goldilocks solution:

  • Simple enough to use immediately

  • Professional enough to stay organized

  • Affordable enough for 1-10 properties

  • Saves hours per month

Competitive Landscape

  • AppFolio, Buildium: $300-500/mo, built for 100+ units

  • Avail, TurboTenant: Free with transaction fees (2.95%), limited features

  • Zillow Rental Manager: Free but very basic

  • You: Paid subscription, comprehensive features, affordable

Go-to-Market

Phase 1: Launch (Months 1-3)

  • SEO: "property management software for small landlords"

  • Content: "Managing rental properties without losing your mind"

  • Facebook/Instagram ads targeting landlords

  • Offer 60-day free trial

  • Goal: 100 paying landlords

Phase 2: Grow (Months 4-9)

  • Partner with real estate investor communities

  • YouTube tutorials: "How to manage rental properties"

  • Case studies from successful users

  • Referral program (landlords tell other landlords)

  • Goal: 1,000 paying landlords

Phase 3: Scale (Months 10-18)

  • Integration with accounting software

  • Mobile app launch

  • Add features based on user feedback

  • Goal: 10,000+ paying landlords

Risks & Mitigations

Risk: Free options good enough
Mitigation: Free options are basic, you offer comprehensive solution worth $49/mo

Risk: Low switching willingness (landlords hate changing systems)
Mitigation: Import tool to migrate data from spreadsheets easily

Risk: Support burden (landlords not tech-savvy)
Mitigation: Extensive video tutorials, live chat support, onboarding calls

Five more from the quieter side of the internet.

📈 Founder Story: How Mailgun Became $200M+ with Zero Marketing

The Beginning: Mailgun started in 2010 as internal email infrastructure for another startup. They needed reliable email sending for their app.

Existing options (SendGrid) were expensive and had poor deliverability.

The Insight: Email infrastructure is a nightmare. Deliverability is hard. Developers hate dealing with it.

Build rock-solid email API. Charge fair prices. Let word-of-mouth do the work.

The Growth:

  • 2012: Spun out as standalone company

  • 2014: 10,000 developers using it

  • 2017: Acquired by Rackspace for $200M+

  • 2019: Spun back out (LBO by Turn/River Capital)

  • 2025: 200,000+ customers, $200M+ annual revenue

What You Can Steal: Mailgun never did marketing. Zero ads. Zero sales team.

Just built infrastructure developers needed and priced it fairly.

Webhook relay is the same playbook: solve annoying infrastructure problem developers face, charge reasonable price, let quality speak for itself.

Backend infrastructure > frontend features for SaaS retention and margins.

💭 Final Thought

Infrastructure beats features. Backend beats frontend. Retention beats growth.

  • Micro-creator sponsorships: solve coordination problem (infrastructure)

  • Small landlord software: handle the boring admin (backend)

  • Webhook relay: manage the complex infrastructure (backend)

Nobody gets excited about these problems.

But people pay $29-79/month to make them go away.

Boring SaaS compounds quietly while sexy products burn out loud.

That's it for today and the end of another week.

10 ideas delivered. Multiple underserved markets identified. Weekend builds in progress.

Week 3 starts Monday with fresh opportunities.

Building any of these? Reply and tell me.

Sponsor Loose Ends? Fill out this form.

See you Monday.

Connor

P.S. Missed Saturday's deep dive? "Audience Is Not Demand" explains why 10k followers ≠ $10k MRR. Read it here.

Keep Reading

© 2026 Loose ends.
Report abusePrivacy policyTerms of use
beehiivPowered by beehiiv